I read it twice; also have no idea what it’s implying

I imagine it's a case where you hire a dozen or so test attendants.

Humans born for energy use/consumption was the initial plot to The Matrix wasn’t it?

Try something not boring and see what happens?

Well that’s interesting. It shows they’re also infringing on Isaac asimov’s Foundation series

https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-sql-db-vector-search/...

Well, this proves infringement. JK Rowling can take them to court if she chooses.

>> Reviewing docs is a lower bar than reviewing code because it's a lower bar than reviewing code.

You reason in circles

No, they are specifically using a tautology to make a point.

Same here. Four or five pairs of eyes on external comms, nothing like this would even get past the abstract submission.

Likely it wouldn't get written at all. The most useful aspect of layered approval processes is people treat them like outright bans and don't blog at all unless it's part of the job description.

If there's no reward for your effort but you might get punished then there's no point trying.

No one gets punished for trying. It’s a simple “no thanks”

I am afraid my NAS will have a hard drive failure, and I won’t be able to order replacements. I should’ve bought a back up

Exactly, me too and at 10 years it's gonna happen :(

I slept without noise for years until I needed it for a while for (reason) and now it feels difficult to sleep without noise. Acclimation’s a real effect

It’s not reporting, it is an advertisement for the authors book… Buried halfway down