Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tolerance's commentslogin

Heavy is the head.

Wrong thread, Rolexes are discussed above.


This sort of rhetoric makes Paul Ruebens sound like Noam Chomsky.


I'm a little disappointed that this isn't a separate platform. But it is bee-yoo-tee-ful and I dig the categorization.


Thanks. I suppose it could be its own platform. I guess I felt HN community already provides good curation, just needed needed one extra filter pass :)


How about this: take the filter, leave the community. Start a new one.


For curiosity's sake—not criticism—how accurate is the Pangram score? If this is AI assisted at all then what was the authoring process like?


This is a splendid way to describe my disdain for this very article.


It's funny how the appeal/aesthetic to these environments is almost the exact inverse of "liminal spaces".


in that its lovely and highly functional? sure. what disturbs me is that the lit map is wrapped around this large empty room. but the operator would get the same angular view if the whole thing was just somewhat smaller and wrapped more closely around the desk. the use of space here seems extravagant and kind of unsettling


The central room feels large today, but I bet it was the right size for 1930s technology.

The space requirement comes from two things: the diagrams on the panels are actually fairly complex with lots of controls thwt fit mostly inside the diagrams themselves. Operators in the room should be able to scan the whole diagram easily from a central position.

Thw size of the room then becomes a requirement because all the panels need to be oriented inwards, not occluded and they can't shrink down too much because the controls need to fit.


Speaking of not being occluded, my first thought about that floor lamp. Why not use a ceiling lamp for unobstructed views?


https://www.flickr.com/photos/132123913@N03/48775624516/in/a...

Backside of the panels. This might help you understand why the amount of space used is not at all extravagant. We're spoiled with our disposable, tiny electronics. Those things were meant to last decades.


> The Zig community is decentralized. Anyone is free to start and maintain their own community, which is not subject to these rules.


The second part affirms that it is centralized. There is nothing wrong with that except saying that because you can leave the community and go elsewhere, it is ipso facto decentralized.


I figure they're either using a loose interpretation of "decentralized" or an honest interpretation of "community".


This is not a forum where sympathy for Queensbridge is the standard.


Nas has had quite a few solid VC exits. These worlds cross paths often.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: