Ambiguous without more context. 50% of assets for the time period determined by your relevant laws.
In my part of the world, that’s 50% of community property built after the relationship is formally recognized (e.g. marriage, cohabitation, etc.). You own less individually the more time you choose to commit to the relationship. That’s an incentive for the one with more assets to leave, and for the one with less assets to stay, if you want to think about it in those terms. However, that’s not a healthy way to maintain a relationship that builds community property.
It is utterly annoying to see emojis pollute information presented in a technical manner. It’s the hallmark of generated technical slop and seems to appeal to the perpetual resume polishers found on LinkedIn.
In my part of the world, that’s 50% of community property built after the relationship is formally recognized (e.g. marriage, cohabitation, etc.). You own less individually the more time you choose to commit to the relationship. That’s an incentive for the one with more assets to leave, and for the one with less assets to stay, if you want to think about it in those terms. However, that’s not a healthy way to maintain a relationship that builds community property.
reply