Interesting. Just tried similar convo (i did warn Claude I will trick it) and it did not fail so spectacularly

https://pastebin.com/sVKA1tyw

> You can also beat the Neo on every measure by comparing it to $700 Windows laptops

Can you count how many (out of 9) measurements the windows laptop beat the Neo in that article?

> How can cursor be worth even 10% of 60B?

Maybe because SpaceX paid with monopoly money (all stock deal)?

It's the data. To do RL.

Would you prefer to pay $100 for software, or a 50% marginal tax on a meager £100K?

Depends on what I get for it and it is close to NYC and San Francisco it the 100 to 200k range. I do agree though that it is too high.

The numbers you mention are total fraud losses. Most of fraud has nothing to do with phones, it is fraudulent money transfers and card charges.

Where is the initial point of engagement when it comes to most scams targeting the elderly? It is via phones, email, and messaging services.

Pretty good. Compare with a real sunny day on that street.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/kf7ELMLoFPn3qioDA

Facebook offered paid subscription for ad-free experience in Europe.[1] First, europeans complained it is too expensive. After a price cut, they EC still wanted a free version with less personalization.[2]

If google offers something similar, I am pretty sure Europeans will find something else to complain about.

[1] https://about.fb.com/news/2024/11/facebook-and-instagram-to-...

[2] https://www.engadget.com/social-media/meta-will-let-facebook...

ad-free and "we won't sell your data" are two different things.

Look at the traffic signs. You have very limited time to read the sign. That's the reason they have distinct patterns and rarely (except in USA) rely on blocks of text.

Nano Banana is focused on editing. But the Pro version handles your prompt much better. First image is Pro, second is 2.5

https://imgur.com/a/3PDUIQP

Wow, that top image is actually quite good! Interestingly, I just got into Pro and got a worse result than yours. https://imgur.com/a/ENNk68B ... and it really seems to just vary by attempt even with the exact same prompt.

> but there is a whole range of forces driving a sharp decline in jobs

Technically, there is no decline in jobs. There were more jobs as of March 2025 than a year before. Less than reported earlier, but the overall number of jobs is still growing.

> there is no decline in jobs. There were more jobs as of March 2025 than a year before. Less than reported earlier, but the overall number of jobs is still growing

Correct [1].

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS