Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
|
zero1009's comments
login
zero1009
35 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
next
[–]
| on:
GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, ...
Felt the same until I started using Luna. I feel like I get similar performance, but faster, and my usage lasts so much longer.
Alifatisk
34 days ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Yup, GPT-5.6 Luna was a checkpoint for me. Too good for its price.
zero1009
4 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
prev
[–]
| on:
Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter
Someone pays for the AI? That's the new human maintainer.
nozzlegear
4 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Who will pay if someone, somewhere is not passionate about it?
throw1234567891
4 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
You can spin up a model locally and pay yourself. Who will maintain the project if the passionate sole maintainer burns out?
nozzlegear
3 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I strictly use only local models, so I agree, but the project was built with Fable so my argument hinges on the assumption that the maintainer is going to continue using Fable and needs to pay for it.
inigyou
4 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Which model works well?
all2
3 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Qwen 3.6 27b at q6 works decently well on 24GB of VRAM
bloppe
4 months ago
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
Hypothetically, maybe. In practice, probably not.
CookieCrisp
4 months ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
If it's valuable enough to someone, and it isn't keeping up, someone will pay. If it's not valuable enough for someone to pay, then who cares?
jpfromlondon
4 months ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Plenty of important things have been born of passion without necessity.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: