Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zparky's commentslogin

I love alibris

> The machine has a single thread performance that exceeds any and all Intel/AMD processors

Not true at all: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/single-thread/


Those chart seem _very_ suspect when it comes to Apple CPUs, to the point I don't think they're worth considering much.

M3 Ultra being fastest in single core than M4 or A19 Pro doesn't make any sense.

Those chart also suggest that M3->M4 was a _regression_ in performance, which, is... an interesting conclusion.


True for Geekbench.

Which notoriously favors anything made by Apple.

Said only by those that don’t favor Apple.

It's current year, of course they used AI to help [0], and it does feel like the article was AI assited.

"This map isn't flat — it has 5 levels of elevation."

"The ocean isn't just a blue plane — it has animated caustic sparkles"

"The fundamental issue:" and "The key constraint:"

I still enjoyed the article.

[0] https://github.com/felixturner/hex-map-wfc/commit/1679be


At what point is this style going to become human style? Kids use LLMs to learn, pick up their patterns, repeat them.

They link to that site in the post

Ah I read it but missed it!

engineer vs end user


similar, keepass synced with google drive. sure it's on some platform, but if my master file is stolen I feel like it taking ~1s and 128MB per guess it's unfeasible for my file to be cracked.


My main worry is some software dependency in password safe is compromised and my passwords are hoovered up while I have the file open!


Thank you for posting your thoughts on a relevant conversation with LLMs, instead of pasting 8 paragraphs of its output.


OP said most people live under some form of authoritarianism, not a worse form than China's.


Revanced on Android devices is the perfect solution for all of the youtube shortcomings


to be fair, every other comment is usually screaming about how if you aren't able to utilize LLMs effectively, you will be without a job soon. most people want to keep their job, or be employable, so if LLMs are a required tool to know, they're trying to become fluent in it by using it.


> to be fair, every other comment is usually screaming about how if you aren't able to utilize LLMs effectively, you will be without a job soon

I think a lot of these "it's all overhyped crap" posts are a hypocritical.

If someone wants to be consistent with their "it's crap" argument, they wouldn't be using it for anything. Period.

If someone says they need it for their job, then they are admitting that it's useful for their job. Because it would otherwise be irrational to use a tool that makes them worse at their job.


Perhaps the out of job prediction is actually reversed. True, LLMs will become an efficiency increasing tool. But in terms of job security, doesn't that mean that if your whole job can be driven by an LLM then demand for that job decreases?

In other words, people claiming these high productivity increases may be the ones at actual risk. Why employ 3 people when 1 can write the prompts?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: