I am already aware of the Barr Group team and I know their claim.
>NASA didn't find a software defect, this is not the same as NASA finding that there is no software defect.
Read my post carefully. I haven't claimed such a thing and I offered two possibilities.
>Toyota absolutely built and sold dangerous vehicles with software and hardware defects.
You have to be careful with this. The Barr Group team haven't proven the relationship between the accident, and the software defect which they claim to found of.
The important thing is that software, hardware, system, and the whole design for car safety can improve significantly better than the current situation, which is much more better than just relying on human drivings.
>NASA didn't find a software defect, this is not the same as NASA finding that there is no software defect.
Read my post carefully. I haven't claimed such a thing and I offered two possibilities.
>Toyota absolutely built and sold dangerous vehicles with software and hardware defects.
You have to be careful with this. The Barr Group team haven't proven the relationship between the accident, and the software defect which they claim to found of.
The important thing is that software, hardware, system, and the whole design for car safety can improve significantly better than the current situation, which is much more better than just relying on human drivings.