So long as a dangerously insane candidate is in danger of winning an election, the only ethical choice is to vote for the sane candidate most likely to win in any race.
Agree that we need multiple functional sane parties, but we haven't had that happy situation in the US for forty years.
I totally agree, you have to work within the framework you have, and in this case that means voting against the crazies. It just doesn't work very well. I don't claim to have any answers for what would work better, it's just that this particular answer is unsatisfying.
Agree that we need multiple functional sane parties, but we haven't had that happy situation in the US for forty years.