you just pasted a wall of text about AMD's use of ARM processors, and not ARM TrustZone, which is what we were talking about.
While AMD's use of ARM processors (and with it, TrustZone) to fashion a security blackbox on your chip is dishonest and terrifying, it is not evidence that TrustZone is what you're saying it is. I invite you to research more into TrustZone, so you'll be less afraid of ARM.
I'm sort of genuinely confused what is happening on your side of this conversation. Your account is too old to be trolling, but it surely seems like it.
Here's the conversation I see:
1. How do they deal with the intel management engine in all intel chips? https://libreboot.org/faq/
2. AMD and ARM have them, as well. It's almost impossible to avoid these hardware backdoors.
3. Cite? and our remarks back and forth.
Who is talking about ARM TrustZone? That wall of text was libre boot's explanation (from the original link) of what AMD and ARM's Intel Management Engine equivalent system is.
your wall of text only explains AMD's management engine. not ARM. again, you should probably go look at the TrustZone documentation. it isn't what you think it is.
further, your "anyone that tells you your emperor is wearing no clothes is trolling" attitude is something HN'ers attempt to avoid.
While AMD's use of ARM processors (and with it, TrustZone) to fashion a security blackbox on your chip is dishonest and terrifying, it is not evidence that TrustZone is what you're saying it is. I invite you to research more into TrustZone, so you'll be less afraid of ARM.