almost nobody disagrees on actual provable,
scientific facts. The toughest disagreements
usually arise around things which are not facts,
but are presented as if they were.
If that is true, then it is a sign of hope for the scheme. The tendency of people to agree on the provable facts gives us a grip, if the non-facts are merely presented as facts, then a innovative, computer-aided system of presentation might help people distinguish the two.
