My concern with a court ordering non-contact with Facebook is that Facebook's omnipresence on the internet would make complying with that order quite difficult in practice. Simply going online, with intent to go online, would be sufficient to violate a non-contact order.
In my (perhaps bad) example, the grocery store with an in-store post office, was to try to extend the blurring of lines between two independent parties in the physical world. Post office may wish to exclude you from all their places of operations, but you still gotta eat and get food from somewhere.
To function in this world, you need the ability to get online and if you are online long enough, you will touch Facebook systems.
In my (perhaps bad) example, the grocery store with an in-store post office, was to try to extend the blurring of lines between two independent parties in the physical world. Post office may wish to exclude you from all their places of operations, but you still gotta eat and get food from somewhere.
To function in this world, you need the ability to get online and if you are online long enough, you will touch Facebook systems.