So something factually incorrect is preferable? And is it not possible to simply... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

theli0nheart on Aug 9, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)

So something factually incorrect is preferable? And is it not possible to simply expand the acronym? E.g.

"The Office of Strategic Services' 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)"

idrios on Aug 9, 2016 [–]

From the article:

"Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions."

Are you a secret CIA saboteur?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact