Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Software modems, you mean. Real modems are attached to serial ports and don't require drivers :-)


Essentially, it doesn't matter what mechanism generates the signals except when it came down to me wanting to play with Linux twenty years ago and a company decided to release a product that was only compatible with a single operating system. My desire to play with Linux did not happen to be worth as much as it would have cost to do so at the time, so I waited.


It does. The soft modens were partly a lockin technique to decrease odds you'd be able to use something like Linux without buying new hardware. The strategy apparently worked. It's why I push for standards-compliant hardware that requires no funny business to use in new ways.


WinModems were a way to save money, plain and simple. Even Apple had their GeoPort software modem, and they sure didn't need any more lock-in.


That was the other thing people told me. I was never sure which was most accurate reason.


That was one of the key events in my life that convinced me of free software ideals.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: