Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't signing each release with a private key be the simplest solution here?

(that can take many forms, but that general idea is how most software updates currently work)



RSA means big integer which means unhappy performance on devices that often don't even have floating point in hardware. I think elliptic curve could be faster?


> I think elliptic curve could be faster?

Yes, EdDSA is faster, with 64 byte signatures. Recommended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EdDSA


Verifying a signature is not the simplest thing to do on hardware that doesn't even support a normal OS.


I see, that makes sense. Let's say you implement verification as:

1. Hashing the incoming data

2. Decrypting an attached signature

3. Verifying the decrypted and calculated hash are the same

Even though Step 2 would involve RSA or ECC, wouldn't Step 1 be the most expensive part regardless?


Yup you are right.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: