Wikipedia claims that Dutch dictionaries sort 'ij' as if it were two characters, but telephone directories sort as if it were 'y'.
Based on precedent, I'd expect the Unicode Consortium to declare it the radical of a Chinese character.
(it does exist in Unicode, but as a ligature -- U+0132 for majuscule, U+0133 for minuscule -- and decomposes to the two code points for 'i' and 'j', with use of the ligature discouraged)
Based on precedent, I'd expect the Unicode Consortium to declare it the radical of a Chinese character.
(it does exist in Unicode, but as a ligature -- U+0132 for majuscule, U+0133 for minuscule -- and decomposes to the two code points for 'i' and 'j', with use of the ligature discouraged)