Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not really. If we can agree that people respond to incentives, then we should make sure the incentives of how we constitute civil society align with their purpose and that the purpose doesn't get perverted through gamesmanship.

For instance, arguably schools are primarily for education. So increasing the access to and quality of education is probably a decent goal.

For profit systems certainly have increased the access to, but arguably deceased the quality of, and arguably education is only incidental to the true project, which is profit.^1

It's this problem, where we entrust civic needs in private hands and hope the needs are satisfied incidentally.

The problem with communism is that it's somewhat the same thing. Instead of economic capital, they fight for political capital using a similar perversion of incentives.

I don't think there exists a Grand Unified Equation that works for all civic needs and I don't think that the best answers already exist.

Instead, I think it should be openly and honestly researched like all other sciences and leave the sportsmanship and team cheering world it currently occupies.

----

[1] For-Profit schools may have their place. I don't know much about auto mechanics or plumbing, but I can imagine a certified for-profit program would be a fine way to do this. I can also imagine them cutting costs, paying off inspections, and passing everyone so nobody stops paying the tuition. The goal is to not make ripping people off and cheating them out of an education such a profitable and incentivized thing to do.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: