the report you've cited references the same Washington Post story I've noted above, which is the source of all this misinformation
>"A secret CIA assessment...the Washington Post reported, citing officials briefed on the matter."
If it's a secret assessment, how did WaPo get a hold of it? How does the CIA not disclose this information to US Congress, who has oversight over the CIA, when they're asked to testify re: this new information?
Please see the first link in my previous post.
Nearly every single one of these "Russia did it!" stories cites the Washington Post article[1]. Interestingly, the article itself says:
>a senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.
and
>For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said.
As mentioned elsewhere, there's is zero coverage on the contents of the emails leaked & the blatent corruption that should make people mad. CNN even said it was illegal for anyone other than CNN to look at the Clinton Email leaks.
Why is the media so afraid?
The CIA and mainstream news is clearly lying to American people to trigger war.
They seem to have no control over PEOTUS, who is shutting down Military contracts via Twitter -- how can the military industrial complex survive without endless war!?
There has been no suggestion that Trump is willing to seriously dismantle the MIC, in fact to the contrary, he is calling for expanded capabilities.
> The CIA and mainstream news is clearly lying to American people to trigger war.
These kinds of claims are not appropriate. You have not offered any evidence that this true, yet state it as fact. It is a wild accusation and an irresponsible one.
>"A secret CIA assessment...the Washington Post reported, citing officials briefed on the matter."
If it's a secret assessment, how did WaPo get a hold of it? How does the CIA not disclose this information to US Congress, who has oversight over the CIA, when they're asked to testify re: this new information?
Please see the first link in my previous post.
Nearly every single one of these "Russia did it!" stories cites the Washington Post article[1]. Interestingly, the article itself says:
>a senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.
and
>For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said.
As mentioned elsewhere, there's is zero coverage on the contents of the emails leaked & the blatent corruption that should make people mad. CNN even said it was illegal for anyone other than CNN to look at the Clinton Email leaks.
Why is the media so afraid?
The CIA and mainstream news is clearly lying to American people to trigger war.
They seem to have no control over PEOTUS, who is shutting down Military contracts via Twitter -- how can the military industrial complex survive without endless war!?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama...