They didn't buy it. HP is too greedy about the lucrative revenue & maybe patents they get off VMS that made me wonder why they killed it in the first place. Instead, it appears (not certain) that VMS Software Inc gets some OEM-like license that puts them in control of it while HP still owns it, can license it themselves (probably existing customers), and likely gets a portion of VMS Software Inc's licensing revenue. So, they've pushed off almost all responsibility for it onto another company without actually selling it or losing all the revenue.
Still a good development for VMS customers. Both legacy and people who will suffer through archaic stuff to reap benefits of bulletproof clusters. I'd be happy to. :) Only problem is it's basically got no security attention over the years with plenty of zero days or configuration issues lurking in there. If I deployed in a company, I plan to put network guards in front of it to absorb attacks while converting the traffic into something easy to process. Ideally, a PCI-based guard that forces it to only talk to the application's memory instead of rest of system. Plus safe-coded apps (Rust, Ada) and API wrappers to try to spot BS. That VMS supports cross-language development will probably help.
EDIT: The weird thing is they finished a port to Alpha ISA before they got to x86 ISA for migrations. I thought Alpha's already migrated to Itanium. Didn't see that coming lol.
https://www.vmssoftware.com/about_faq.html#faq1
They didn't buy it. HP is too greedy about the lucrative revenue & maybe patents they get off VMS that made me wonder why they killed it in the first place. Instead, it appears (not certain) that VMS Software Inc gets some OEM-like license that puts them in control of it while HP still owns it, can license it themselves (probably existing customers), and likely gets a portion of VMS Software Inc's licensing revenue. So, they've pushed off almost all responsibility for it onto another company without actually selling it or losing all the revenue.
Still a good development for VMS customers. Both legacy and people who will suffer through archaic stuff to reap benefits of bulletproof clusters. I'd be happy to. :) Only problem is it's basically got no security attention over the years with plenty of zero days or configuration issues lurking in there. If I deployed in a company, I plan to put network guards in front of it to absorb attacks while converting the traffic into something easy to process. Ideally, a PCI-based guard that forces it to only talk to the application's memory instead of rest of system. Plus safe-coded apps (Rust, Ada) and API wrappers to try to spot BS. That VMS supports cross-language development will probably help.
EDIT: The weird thing is they finished a port to Alpha ISA before they got to x86 ISA for migrations. I thought Alpha's already migrated to Itanium. Didn't see that coming lol.