Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean, there was a nice 15 or so year period between the "new" post-Minsky-and-Papert Perceptron book connectionism and the current "new new" connectionism where neural nets were a definite backwater. Most of the PIs doing neural nets dealt with it by being sad but Schmidhuber seems to have dealt with it by doubling down on the weirdness.


Just because it wasn't wildly popular doesn't mean there was a gap of any sorts. I agree with Schmidhuber. http://grey.colorado.edu/emergent




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: