Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The conclusions are correct. Talking about them isn't sensationalist just because you think they're foreseeable.


I refered to "being not surprised that encryption is broken". There was nothing relevant to encr in the document. The title is wrong.


Who said "being not surprised that encryption is broken"??? Read the quote again: "Intercepting audio/texts before encryption"

I'm not surprised that they can INTERCEPT and read ALL your communications... jeez


Ok in that sense i am wrong. But it could mean sometging else.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: