"but inappropriate to cut obligations to creditors we call 'bondholders'?"
The part where I said bondholders should be held harmless is a fiction inside your head. When the gears finally strip the bondholders in these cases (Detroit, GM, etc.) take epic baths, and I don't shed any tears for them either. $7 billion in bondholders’ obligations in Detroit were erased, for example.
So I suppose there is little difference between supposed "creditors we call pensioners" and actual creditors; everyone gets wrecked.
The part where I said bondholders should be held harmless is a fiction inside your head. When the gears finally strip the bondholders in these cases (Detroit, GM, etc.) take epic baths, and I don't shed any tears for them either. $7 billion in bondholders’ obligations in Detroit were erased, for example.
So I suppose there is little difference between supposed "creditors we call pensioners" and actual creditors; everyone gets wrecked.