Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's no reason to cite a Google-translated version of this article when a suitable, well-explained English article exists in the New York Times: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/10/technology/fingerprint...

As the article notes, you really need more than one imprint in order to get into a phone - the authors suggest that five distinct imprints could get into about 40-50% of phones, which fits within the 5 try limit imposed by many systems.



Right. Url changed from https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https....

Submitters: Please don't post Google translate links.


From the NYT article.

> The researchers did not test their approach with real phones, and other security experts said the match rate would be significantly lower in real-life conditions. Still, the findings raise troubling questions about the effectiveness of fingerprint security on smartphones.

I wonder what the actual impact/severity is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: