I asked if you'd ever changed a segment selector in userland code and why. You said "yes", didn't say why, blew smoke about how "Intel says its possible to change them!" (no shit?), said changing the stack segment selector is "defensive coding" (again: userland code practically disables segment addressing, except for conveniences like the TEB at GS), made reference to a "published standard", and then called me a "supposed" security expert. And, let's be clear, you're the expert that can't remember the eight (8) GPRs on x86.
I'm convinced you can code, but I'm equally convinced that you had no business berating someone else for asking questions about how Cygwin handles its stack, because you don't know either. Don't pile on to people.
I'm convinced you can code, but I'm equally convinced that you had no business berating someone else for asking questions about how Cygwin handles its stack, because you don't know either. Don't pile on to people.