Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The party making the claim is using anecdotal evidence.

No, the party making the fact claim made a fact claim limited to a particular program they had been in, and has, as yet, neither provided evidence (or even an operationalization) for that claim not been challenged to do so.

> They have no data.

That may or may not be the case; it's perfectly fine to dismiss the claim due to lack of data, better to challenge the claimant to provide support for the claim. Calling it racism is as unsupported as the claim itself.

> I do not think anecdotal evidence is good evidence for such a strong claim.

The fact claim made was particularly limited (about productivity in one Ph.D. program—from which no further generalization was claimed), it wasn't a particularly strong claim. That said, sure, anecdotal evidence is inadequate to support it, but then, not even anecdotal evidence was provided, only the bare claim.

> This makes the claim an opinion and not factual.

A claim on a matter of fact doesn't become anything other than a fact claim because it isn't offered with adequate support.



The claim was:

> Second, the foreign students increase the schools' reputations and can collaborate with the faculty. Research is a public good.

Their evidence for the claim was personal experience.

A claim about a matter of fact is not a fact. A fact needs evidence. Otherwise it's just nonsense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: