Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Also, they did update the erroneous articles:

Ah so they did, my mistake.

I think the idea is that we all make mistakes.

I am in total agreement, we all do make mistakes, and it's refreshing when people own up to them. I guess my main question still stands though. As a top-tier data journalism outlet, why was a data QA not performed prior to analysis, or, before publishing results? And if there was data QA performed, where did it fail? It just seems that they got bit by a time crunch to publish content amid the FCC repeal and sloppy analysis was the result.



Everyone can do better. It's impossible to research every story from first principles of physics.


They probably just didn't think of this possible flaw in data. I mean, it's not like the university researchers caught wind of any problem, either.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: