That comment makes me chuckle. These days, I have close to zero faith in commercial software that is "free", assuming that the business model is selling my data.
I happily paid for Little Snitch and was comforted by the fact that I was the customer.
True. But in practice, a software company that's making money from users has a lot of incentive not to harm their brand, or open themselves up to competition, by being shady.
It does happen but users are waking up to the problem and companies are learning.
Outcomes from such clauses also hinge on whether metadata describing the operation of their system - such as logs showing who communicated with who - is your data, or their data.
Following recent changes to law here in Australia, for example, metadata is essentially the property of the state.
The new major version offers a lot more functionality. I looked into it and decided I wanted it, so I upgraded. I assume that I could have stayed with the old major version but I'm not sure.
Indeed. I'm especially suspicious of "security" software. Releasing free high quality security seems to be a popular attack vector for advertisers, spammers, hackers, and nation states.
I happily paid for Little Snitch and was comforted by the fact that I was the customer.