Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd have done the same if Broadcom were an American company. I oppose it because I pretty much reflexively oppose all mergers of huge companies leading to more consolidation: the evidence is overwhelming that this is harming competition and increasing prices across a variety of business sectors. As for the national security aspect, I don't give a shit. Trump did the right thing for the wrong reason.


And this is a private equity play - buy the company. Strip it of its assets, ignore any future R&D opportunities and move on as soon as all revenues are exhausted.

Hate these type of moves.


>And this is a private equity play - buy the company. Strip it of its assets, ignore any future R&D opportunities and move on as soon as all revenues are exhausted.

How have you established that this is the most likely outcome?


Private equity? Both of the companies are publicly listed in the US.


Yes, but the acquisition was to be financed with $106 billion in debt https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-12/broadcom-...


That should be called a locust merger


Would you mind linking to the evidence and explaining how it applies to this specific case?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: