For 20+ years the US - as the dominate controlling agent regarding the Internet - ensured the modern (post early 1990s) Internet remained extremely non-regulated and non-interfered with by ~195 nations (when it came to the global Internet system). It worked globally out of the gate and required no special adherence to US laws. The Chinese did not have to adopt US freedom of speech approaches to use the Internet. The Iranians or Saudis did not have to adopt US freedom of religion approaches to use the Internet. The EU did not have to adopt US legal approaches or laws to use the Internet. Any other scenario than the one the US pursued would have resulted in a fractured, mostly useless global Internet. The US was about as good of a shepherd as any nation could have ever been: thus we got several billion users onto the Internet from wildly diverse background jurisdictions. The way the US built the Internet made it possible for the EU to say: hey, we're going to do GDPR, because that works for us (and yet the Internet still works); and for other jurisdictions to say: hey, we're going to do this that or something else because that works for us.

> The whole internet dances to the US tune, legally.

You've got that almost exactly backwards. The US approach has required almost no dancing at all to the US tune. That's precisely why ~4 billion people can use the Internet from 195 nations, all with dramatically varying laws. They're not adopting US law to use the Internet. That's why the Chinese have been able to implement their unique approach and still use the Internet (restricted to fit their tolerances at a government level).

You very specifically do not have to dance to US legal tunes to use the Internet. Even when it comes to IP laws, you do not have to dance to the US tune (Europe has varied widely from the US on such, eg as it relates to piracy, and yet the Internet keeps on regardless).

> Will the US be as benevolent and open when it's the underdog?

US benevolence will increase in direct proportion to the extent that it isn't the sole global superpower (realistically it has been the sole superpower since WW2, the USSR power projection was mostly a facade, as it always had a terrible economy). Its perceived role as global policeman, has put it into an endless number of ridiculous positions (both politically and militarily). The less the US believes it has to be the prime actor in that regard, and the more the US has to inter-operate with everyone else in a normal fashion, the less obnoxious it will be about a lot of things. It will be able to semi-normalize back to closer to how other major nations behave.

Obviously the US will remain an outsidzed global superpower. Its economy and military scale alone will ensure that. However the coming future in which China is a real rival that can stand toe to toe, will force a number of fascinating adjustments to all politics around the globe (and I mean not just to US politics, all politics for all countries).

The real question to ask is, will China be benevelont with its future power? Look at what they're doing to their people right now for the answer (vast Muslim torture camps like the Mao days, where people are being forced with violence and psychological torture to give up their Islamic beliefs; literally torturing homosexual people to convert them away from homosexuality; restricting "homosexual speech" because it's anti-Socialism; wiping out what limited speech the people of China had acquired; using its military to annex the South China Sea away from its neighbors, which is 4x the size of France or Texas; etc). Now consider for a moment that that is China just getting warmed up as a global power, and consider what other horrific things they may choose to do under dictator Xi (dictatorships have a near universal record of getting worse, rather than better, as it pertains to human rights).

Consider that China has begun an aggressive expansion of its military outside of its borders (laying down plans to build numerous foreign military bases to give it global projection capability). Now one might fairly criticize the US for its global military expanse; however the US hasn't used its might to annex nations or territory globally, it hasn't actually acted as a traditional empire (ie Ramstein military base in Germany is no threat such that the US might suddenly attempt to annex Germany). Meanwhile China routinely threatens to invade Taiwan and annex it, they get upset if you so much as recognize Taiwan as an independent nation or talk to its leader directly. Maybe next week China will decide that Mongolia too is a proper part of the greater China strategy.

So with that growing power, is China suddenly going to become a soft benevolent giant? Or will they get worse? I think the answer is obvious and the planet should be terrified about what's coming. The entire Chinese approach is incompatible with democratic values across the board, and they are without question going to throw their weight around as it pertains to censorship (they already are). They're currently busy buying up Eastern Europe and using their investments to get countries like Greece to block actions against them as it pertains to eg the South China Sea. Imagine a world under the reign of Xi, forced by threat (direct or implied) to comply with how the the CPC operates China today. If people thought the US superpower behavior was bad (a democratic nation with vast human rights protections), that's going to be 10x worse.