I read every one of your comments. When you link to something I was supposed to have read before the prior reply from me to which you are responding, it's customary to link to the earlier in thread, or root of subthread -- not to your latest.
As for "dense", you still don't employ "scam" by its meaning, even after citing that meaning -- and you contradict yourself about users' right to block ads and right to donate. If users do not owe publishers anything in lieu of ad blocking, but we help users anonymously route tokens to publishers anyway, who is scammed? Answer directly.
The link was for the comment to respond to. This argument about commenting custom is completely uninteresting and off-topic. I'm leaving this as a courtesy, so you can try to think from someone else's perspective. I sincerely hope it will help you with other problems in your life.
This is the kind of comment we ban accounts for. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and don't post like this to HN in the future, regardless of how wrong someone else is or you feel they are.
Flamewars like this one are the kind of thing we don't want on HN, so please don't perpetuate them.
You're the one who complained about my replying here not there; I'm happy to drop thread etiquette but your way has nested things awfully deep, and on two subthreads. Better to stick to one, and answer the question: who is scammed? You still have not said.
The link above is my response to your comments combined into the sibling thread. Once again, go there and respond.