It's solving a problem we don't have.
> Of course, it's simple to add a "name" or "type" field. However, the name of the object ought to be denoted differently than its contents, IMHO.
Why?
It's solving a problem we don't have.
> Of course, it's simple to add a "name" or "type" field. However, the name of the object ought to be denoted differently than its contents, IMHO.
Why?