why not just http/quic? using 3 seems strongly suggest that it is the next gener... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		yy77 on Nov 25, 2018 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Some notes about HTTP/3 why not just http/quic? using 3 seems strongly suggest that it is the next generation of http. They knew that but pretend it is not relavent.

dharmab on Nov 26, 2018 [–]

Because there's a decent chance that it will be the next generation of HTTP.

If it doesn't pan out they'll just move on. Remember IPv5?

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact