I'm not arguing against for or against that fact. I'm arguing that these "testing" methodologies are flawed. I'm, apparently, doing a very poor job of expressing the distinction.
Let me state in as clearly as I can:
* A good test would ensure that the luminance values for all colors matched exactly throughout the test image.
* Said test would need to be displayed using a device that is calibrated to ensure displayed luminance matches encoded luminance.
* A test that pulls color data from a source image with mixed luminance values in each channel is flawed.
* This statement makes absolutely no claim as to the human ability perceive any of these colors.
It does, and your eyes still suck at blue.
Why do you fight so vehemently against the scientific fact that your eyes have fewer blue receptors?