I'd guess redis performs _better_ in that case since there minimum overhead for ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		showerst on April 19, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Search Benchmarking: RediSearch vs. Elasticsearch I'd guess redis performs _better_ in that case since there minimum overhead for redis is much lower than elasticsearch.

weavie on April 19, 2019 [–]

Wouldn't Redis need to keep the whole dataset in memory?

showerst on April 19, 2019 | [–]

In my experience to get decent "show off in benchmarks" performance with ES you want your index to fit in RAM as well, but I haven't done much work with ES outside of high RAM boxes.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact