I find an opinion hard to credit when exact proof is sitting their on an open source repo everyone has access to and a closed source repo only you have access to.
You make a theoretically compelling argument like the "hack" you describe above and then leave out the only part that really matters where you prove it. It is entirely likely that you are simultaneously entirely correct and entirely unable to prove it due to company policy but this leads us to the next logical question.
If you knew you couldn't prove it why did you open your mouth? It seems the only result will be negative PR.
It appears you did not read what I wrote. The similarities are out there for anyone to see, there is plenty of leaked Windows code floating around including on GitHub, and I did not need anything else to form my opinion.
You make a theoretically compelling argument like the "hack" you describe above and then leave out the only part that really matters where you prove it. It is entirely likely that you are simultaneously entirely correct and entirely unable to prove it due to company policy but this leads us to the next logical question.
If you knew you couldn't prove it why did you open your mouth? It seems the only result will be negative PR.