Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

that's by design - popularity is not a good judge however. A better system would be to provide upvote/downvote buttons to only a small, random subset of users in each topic.


or maybe a firing line approach: everyone has upvote/downvote buttons but not everyone's work


How would that improve the situation?


- discourage brigading

- discourage mob behavior

- prevent particularly biased individuals from skewing every discussion

- adds stochastic variety to the biases of the group


I don't see how approximate popularity is better than popularity for the first three factors. It would achieve the 4th in individual threads, but amplifying randomly-selected niche viewpoints in different threads adds up to the same biases across threads (unless the selection of blessed users is thread-independent, in which case the community has a randomly-selected group of first-class citizens).




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: