Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, but this version is not necessarily optimal. If you have 4 positive samples, then you will test 2+2+1+1+1+1 = 8, instead of 4 in the naive case.

It feels like a problem for information theory.



I didn’t say it was optimal, but it is a huge improvement on doing 64 tests for 64 samples.


Oh, sure!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: