I was addressing his specific insinuation about HN. If this was just about national media, why even mention HN otherwise in that comment?
No, the clear implication was that there was some kind of double standard in HN here.
I'm not addressing the rest of his comment, which may or may not be true. But the first part is clearly misleading, or at best uncharitable.
Finally, the full comment is available for all to see by looking up exactly a quarter screen. I didn't "remove" anything-I pulled the quote pertaining to the issue that concerned me.
> nor more than a whisper on the national media circus. I presume you haven't heard about it, either.