Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One funny thing could come out of this: too much of it could be removed.

Once a company is working on this they might accidentaly or through greed start to see "TOO MUCH CARBON" everywhere.



Putting carbon into the atmosphere much easier than removing it, I don't see how this could ever happen


I've seen people make this comment before, and I usually just dismiss it because it seems so absurdly unlikely. But is there any grounds to that fear?


Technically if it expands and runs in a carbon dioxide surplus for long enough and they maintained it for as long as thr process was viable. But it is currently a facepalm worthy seriously bad extrapolation. Like looking at carbon nanotube production assuming extrapolating exponential growth rates indefinitely and concluding that there will be a serious carbon shortage when production rises so high that every year mass equivalent to entire world's biomass is produced.


what about a cycling synergy between digging oil and reclaiming it. A kind of circular two sided market.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: