Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
BeatLeJuce
on Oct 17, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Neural Databases
Not one or two, more like one or two hundred. But otherwise: yeah.
dougabug
on Oct 17, 2020
[–]
One of the authors said in a talk that it worked with as few as 15 images.
BeatLeJuce
on Oct 17, 2020
|
parent
[–]
So that's an order of magnitude more than what OP suggested and one less than what I suggested. But I still think that 100 is a more realistic estimate to get stellar results.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
