I would argue that the American people evolve in a less that ideal environment for constructive argumentation due to the biparty politics. It nearly seems by construction that if an issue is endorsed by a party, then the other must be against it. For the untrained partisan of party A, every partisans of party B disagrees on every issue by default. I can see why it becomes difficult to stay rational.
Obviously, some people are willing to meet and discuss constructively, but that requires additional efforts to think outside this biparty mold.
Obviously, some people are willing to meet and discuss constructively, but that requires additional efforts to think outside this biparty mold.