Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I get it, that's its the Post. But there are a lot of things going against the major outlets in this debate: a.) It's a federal case so except for identities, most of the damning information against Twitter is out there b.) Major outlets such as NYT like to brag about the size of their newsrooms, but don't seem to have the resources to cover stories of CP on Twitter and the lackadaisical attitude of its censors c.) Major outlets should not take days to investigate something like this and write it up, especially if all the content matter is out there. Else obviously openly biased outlets with an axe to grind, such as the Post will pick it up, obviously reducing the credibility of stories they output.


How is "all content matter out there"? From what I can tell, all we have is allegations from the accusing party.


It's a federal suit filed in DC, all the filings are public data, save for identities.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: