>You know what would be revolutionary? Getting rid of currency altogether.
I agree. The future is not keeping track. If someone needs something they should have it. The only reason that hasn't happened is scarcity and logistics, which I believe we will solve in the not so distant future.
The problem is that people need so little and that 98% of commerce consists of people transacting for something more than the bare minimum of staying alive.
>>>If someone needs something they should have it.
What mechanism will exist to validate conflicting "needs" of different people in the not-so-distant future? Extreme example: we can't give everyone their own mansion with a beachfront view in order to prevent triggering them.
I agree. The future is not keeping track. If someone needs something they should have it. The only reason that hasn't happened is scarcity and logistics, which I believe we will solve in the not so distant future.