No. YC is empowering, you are definitely doing it yourself with YC.
To be more specific, my idea hasn't changed, I have personally grown (before I felt YC would 'validate' my idea) and I don't believe that I would be accepted (in other words I don't want to be rejected again). I plan to 'just do it' myself and try to use the resources (my own money) and contacts( people here in the news.yc community) available to me to create something valuable that people will pay to use.
No, it's definitely not. So where's the YC clone that does $80k per founder? I'd bet they will achieve a significantly higher success rate than YC does. More experienced, hungrier, stable founders who are highly motivated not to return to their cubes because they already know how much it sucks.
> More experienced, hungrier, stable founders who are highly motivated not to return to their cubes because they already know how much it sucks.
I conjecture that these kinds of people will tend to be more risk averse and that the group will have a better median result (and higher success rate).
But startup successes can be massive and a better strategy might be to chase the blockbusters with younger people.
The founders out of school (or still in school) get the most publicity, but I'd guess that the median YC founder has been out of college for at least a couple, if not several years.
YC would probably like to think its value-add is far beyond the money it provides.