It exists somehow with Elixir. It's not homoiconic and the interactive developme... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Kototama on Oct 2, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Common Lisp It exists somehow with Elixir. It's not homoiconic and the interactive development experience is far from being as good as Common Lisp or even Clojure but it supports metaprogramming at an advanced level, is functional and dynamically typed.

zerr on Oct 2, 2021 [–]

Besides Algol-like syntax, LISP 2 was meant to be compiled, fast and statically typed.

lokedhs on Oct 2, 2021 | [–]

Common Lisp is 2 out of those three. Implementations such as SBCL give you a lot of static typing too, even though it's optional.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact