Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a recent switcher from macOS to Linux, I find KDE configurability most comfortable and focused on professional UX.

Gnome UI looks childish and overblown to me.

As an UI designer I can confirm that in recent years the trends to maximize engagement trough overuse of animation and unusable distractions is making me mad as hell. The useful and really effective design is invisible.

Or as the new generations of "tech founders" classify polished professional UI work - it is "not exciting enough". I have a different view on interfaces: Never use form over function methodology, the main goal of interfaces are to be useful and accessible.



Gnome UI is perfectly fine on a touch-driven device. Less so on a desktop, but since there are a number of viable alternatives (MATE, Xfce) that still integrate OK with Gnome components the UI itself doesn't matter all that much.


In my professional view touch UI and desktop UI must never be interchangeable or have similarities, the ergonomic interactions of using a mouse pointer are vastly different from the processes when using a finger.

UI matters for a vast majority of users and use-cases, I can live comfortably with tiling windows manager, but this is not the expected default.

That's why I stayed on Catalina for a long time, Apple has lost the focus from the past (and must reread some old HIG documentation for a change). Beauty is not a function of usability (example: the new Safari), the process of making interfaces more "exciting" and "fashionable" has his roots in marketing, not in product design.

I have tried in recent months all forms of DE's for Linux, the simplicity of Cinnamon and Mate was appealing but somewhat limiting.

KDE is modern and extendable, there are a ton of native apps and the experience of customizing the UI is more coherent and logical.

The only gripe that I have with KDE is the built-in telemetry, but luckily PureOS KDE is older implementation, so for now I am ok.:)


KDE's telemetry is opt-in. It does no telemetry by default. Why is that a concern? If you don't like it, don't turn it on?


>KDE's telemetry is opt-in. It does no telemetry by default. Why is that a concern? If you don't like it, don't turn it on?

I am newbie in this world (from a desktop perspective), I guess I consumed more GNU philosophy in latest months.:)

May be I have unreasonable expectations, but you are right, the telemetry is opt in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh_p91XrdeQ


I personally am pretty much a GNU person too. So is KDE. I don't think you can find many communities that care about software freedom like KDE does.

But don't worry. KDE as as free as it gets.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: