This kind of hyperbole makes you look like an unmitigated jackass. Please stop, since I'm pretty sure you're not that bad.
The actual site design is great. It was one illustration.
Why exactly should a single image on the front site make or break your technical case? Have you considered that this might be an indication that your technical case was extremely weak? Or maybe that you're being hard on anyone who exhibits even an inkling of whimsy on their project?
Sheesh. Next you're going to say their association with Devo also hurts jQuery's case because your boss hated Devo.
This kind of hyperbole makes you look like an unmitigated jackass.
You're right. Sorry about the hyperbole.
Why exactly should a single image on the front site make or break your technical case? Have you considered that this might be an indication that your technical case was extremely weak?
I agree with you, of course, but I think you're underestimating how important appearances are to these middle-management types. Especially the ones at service-based companies. They will visit the website to research a tool that I want to use, and if it doesn't look professional, it will get rejected regardless of any technical argument I make. This is true for everyone, not just me.
You have a middle manager type who actually at least puts on airs of doing actual research in an attempt to at least fake an informed decision? Xanadu!
The actual site design is great. It was one illustration.
Why exactly should a single image on the front site make or break your technical case? Have you considered that this might be an indication that your technical case was extremely weak? Or maybe that you're being hard on anyone who exhibits even an inkling of whimsy on their project?
Sheesh. Next you're going to say their association with Devo also hurts jQuery's case because your boss hated Devo.