I'd go with `Math.max(...arr)` personally. Math.max is a variadic function, no n... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		hmsimha on Jan 27, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Poll: Is the leetcode grind necessary to land a hi... I'd go with `Math.max(...arr)` personally. Math.max is a variadic function, no need to add a reduce into the mix.

roryokane on Jan 30, 2022 [–]

That implicitly calls Function.prototype.apply(), which will fail if given more arguments than an implementation-specific limit (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22747068/is-there-a-max-...). Looping with reduce() avoids that restriction.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact