Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

“Tech” women interested in retaining their ability to get medical services they might need would still have a reason to not move to Austin.


Tech women can fly for their abortions.


Tech women would also be unlikely to need abortions in the first place, unintended pregnancies are very uncommon among high-income folks.

E: Huh? What could possibly be controversial about this? Obviously an abortion ban affects low income folks far more than rich tech workers.

For rich people this is a vague political issue, not a practical one.


Not all abortions are "unintended pregnancies"

https://www.facebook.com/106201495/posts/953287657793/


That only works for the simplistic image of abortion (elective, easy, painless, risk free) that the evangelical death cult has been pushing. It doesn't work for the actual medical reality. The disconnect between the two is staggering, and if you don't know what I'm talking about you owe it to yourself to look into the details of the actual medical procedure. It is not elective, easy, painless, or risk free.

And while I support encouraging people to travel to route around their oppressive backwater hellholes, the ability to do so doesn't mean we should support places regressing towards being oppressive hellholes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: