If that truly is the point he's trying to make, then he needs to say that. The message he actually conveyed is "these things aren't important". And while I'd agree with him on the business plan, telling prospective startup founders that they shouldn't ever worry about the balance sheet is pure negligence and he should be called out for it.
I've long respected PG for his role in transforming the VC industry from it's MBA-led Sand Hill Road old boys club into an engineer-led scrappy startup world. And I have enjoyed his writing even when I disagree with much of it. However, his new Twitter persona is absolutely bonkers. Not every insight needs to be contrarian to the point of negligence.
He said _he_ is not going to look at it. That's all.
Tax authorities, YC's due diligence team and others will want to look at it. Anyone competent enough to start a company will know this.
Interpreting this as "pg says balance sheets don't matter at all to anyone" is.... weird. Repeatedly pushing this point is weirder. Maybe take a break from the internet for an hour or two
It could be interpreted in several ways, and you're choosing the worst possible way to argue against. And you're totally overlooking the fact that his career success since the very start of YC has hinged entirely on giving good advice to startups and focusing on the right things. You might think that after 17 years and countless successful companies, we might just think twice about presuming ignorance or malice in what he's saying.
The point of this tweet is just that balance sheets don't determine outcomes for early stage startups; good products and excited users do. Balance sheets matter later. Many of the teams PG invested in were not even incorporated when he invested in them.
I've long respected PG for his role in transforming the VC industry from it's MBA-led Sand Hill Road old boys club into an engineer-led scrappy startup world. And I have enjoyed his writing even when I disagree with much of it. However, his new Twitter persona is absolutely bonkers. Not every insight needs to be contrarian to the point of negligence.