Instantly downloaded after I see that you have an iPad version unlike IG. Really appreciate it, since I do most of my photo editing on the go with my iPad.

Also gotta say I love the simple and straightforward UI, the dice-rolling thing add a unique touch too.

However, I can see that the app still need a lot of performance tweak, the UX for exiting out of a horizontal image scroll is weird as well, I would prefer to be able to swipe up to exit the view here. Otherwise, cool app thus far!

Also I'm pretty sure you can swipe from the left edge of the screen to exit the view - definitely a lot easier than tapping the back button on a large screen like iPad.

Thanks for the feedback! we're definitely still early so performance and UX are being worked on.

Some hopefully useful thoughts. Well done for launching.

* users of photo sites are justifiably worried about how this business is sustainable (or will everything just get deleted). What's your plan?

* Add Creative Commons licenses

* how do I edit or add a title to a picture after uploading?

* Is there a web version? This is a big deal if not.

Freemium, with non-targetted ads (only if we have to).

Tap on the image within the comments view, and use the three dots icon to the lower right of the overlay that appears.

Web version is coming. So many people have requested this - we're definitely aware that it's a big deal.

And because this community in particular is probably interested in this, the app is made with Flutter. Highly recommend for anyone that hasn't yet tried it.

hn community is dead on weekends. I'd repost during the week.

> A photo sharing app that isn't trying to be a TikTok clone

Why would it be, TikTok isn't for photo sharing.. Looks exactly like IG though.

i believe youve answered your own question. IG has formally moved away from pictures in favor of Reels. This headline might be a direct reference to that

The problem with complicated recommendation algorithms is: 1) They aren't transparent—the service could be doing anything behind the scenes, like down-ranking content from competitors and political opponents and up-ranking content from advertisers. Without publicly available rules, there is no way to know 2) The algorithm is designed to get the user to spend as long as possible on the site, so they can see as many ads as possible. But getting the user to spend as many hours as possible on the service isn't necessarily in their best interest; the best thing for the user is to give them the content they are most interested in quickly, in a way that isn't addictive.

1. I don't see why this is a problem. I don't need to know how my car works. I don't need to know how Google works. I just need it to work. Lets assume they do all of bad things you mentioned. I still don't care as long as Google returns the search results that answer my question and isn't filled with spam that games the transparency.

2. Your statements are conflicting. Currently, {social media / search} gives user the content they are most interested in quickly and as much of it as they want. The alternative is what? Showing them less of the content they want? Showing them content they don't want (so they leave)?

In the ideal world, {social media}'s algorithm perfectly aligns with human interests, delivering exactly the content the human wants and as much of this content as the human wants.

I find taking a break from consuming personalized content refreshing. It sometimes feels like I'm missing out on a lot of good stuff simply because the algorithm tries to show me what it thinks I'll like.

I enjoy architecture and interior design photos on IG.

In the future I imagine that computer generated renderings will be impossible to distinguish from photographs.

Sometimes I wonder if next generation algorithms will not only show you what it thinks you like but also create the visual content it thinks you like as well.

The point is that they work...for the company. In most of these cases the business model of the company is ads, which means they want to get as much time on the app as possible, regardless of what that means for the user's mental health or their overall enjoyment. This isn't necessarily what's best for the user.

> regardless of what that means for the user's mental health or their overall enjoyment

So they built an app that people want to use?

Diving down mental health rabbit hole, what is bad for your mental health? Seeing people that are prettier or more successful than you? If so, how does this app discourage recommending content of pretty/successful people? Would you want an app that only has ugly people?

Is there desktop support? apps have their place, but they are almost always better with desktop support (even Whatsapp added that)

Working on it!

Actually, your app is more looked like IG than TikTok. Do you have any features or USP that IG's users should switch to yours?

First, we plan to monetize on a freemium model. This means we don't have an incentive to sell your data to advertisers.

Second, we don't plan to add video. This is a platform just for photos, and for someone who wants something like that it's a good thing.

We also run on iPad, and when we get desktop going it won't be an intentionally broken experience to force you to use the app.

And we actually listen to our users. There's a chat room on the app "Pidgeon Nest" where people have asked for certain features and we've gone and added them. We've also done the same when users have reached out over email.

Oh, I think IG used to be for image only but time by time, it has to develop to video and the trend is short video (Tik Tok - Facebook also create short video and push it to the feed).

Sounds cool! I've decided to try it, is there a way to share to Pidgeon from the Photos app on iOS?

not yet, that's something we'll need to add

What if you are less a photographer and more an artist/illustrator?

That's also very welcome, it's more or less a platform for any sort of imagery

It's good to be explicit about what content you are seeking, as historically spots like 500px were very photo-centric, and other places were a catch-all for anything and how sites gain an identity/curate/attract users can be strongly affected by those early choices (disclosure: I've used dozens of these kinds of services over the years, and even worked at one -DeviantArt- at one point, so my view is only partly anecdotal :)